European Journal of Ultrasound
NEWS

Impact Factor 2024

The Impact Factor 2024 for the UiM/EJU is 2,9

 

       UiM/EJU subscribers
       are now provided with
       a mobile digital issue
       of their journal.
       The eRef app enables
       you to comfortably

read the latest journal issues on your tablet.

Find out more about the eRef app here

Use UiM/EJU offline • optimal reading experience • scalable font size • one click to download UiM/EJU


Ultrasound International Open

New open-access journal!

For author instructions and further information about publishing in UIO, visit www.thieme.com/uio


 

EFSUMB on FACEBOOK


EFSUMB NEWS


 
How to get your paper published in a scientific journal

In general, when you write a paper to submit to scientific journals there is high competition from other authors and research groups. It can be a challenge to get your work published, especially in your early career. It is important that you can create interest of your research results by capturing editors and reviewer's interest. It can be stressful getting a paper published in a scientific journal.

>> Here are some tips so you hopefully don't get stressed during the preparation of your manuscript, submission and reviewers' comments!
 
 

 


More information on all EUROSON Schools can be found on www.efsumb.org >>

 

European Journal of Ultrasound 01-2026

Cai P, Zheng M, Wang Q et. al

To analyze the ultrasound characteristics, clinical management, and pregnancy outcomes of heterotopic intramural pregnancies (HIMPs) after embryo transfer. This was a retrospective observational study of women who were diagnosed with HIMPs. The ultrasound characteristics, clinical treatment, and pregnancy outcomes of patients with HIMPs were evaluated.

 

 

Microvascular imaging versus CEUS in the characterization of renal masses: preliminary experience in a tertiary care referral university hospital

Bertelli E, Vizzi M, Lattavo L et al.

Evaluation of the possible role of microvascular imaging (MI) for the detection of vascularization of renal lesions, while comparing it with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). 137 patients (160 renal lesions, 64 solid and 96 cystic) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. For solid masses, both the intralesional and the peripheral vascularization was analyzed and quantified by MI and then compared to peak enhancement on CEUS. Regarding cystic lesions, we evaluated the presence or absence of vascularization within the cystic wall and/or septa. MI results were compared with CEUS findings using Pearson's Chi square test. An optimal size cut-off for renal lesions was determined with the Youden test.