European Journal of Ultrasound
NEWS

Impact Factor 2023

The Impact Factor 2023 for the UiM/EJU is 3.1

 

       UiM/EJU subscribers
       are now provided with
       a mobile digital issue
       of their journal.
       The eRef app enables
       you to comfortably

read the latest journal issues on your tablet.

Find out more about the eRef app here

Use UiM/EJU offline • optimal reading experience • scalable font size • one click to download UiM/EJU


Ultrasound International Open

New open-access journal!

For author instructions and further information about publishing in UIO, visit www.thieme.com/uio


 

EFSUMB on FACEBOOK


EFSUMB NEWS


 
How to get your paper published in a scientific journal

In general, when you write a paper to submit to scientific journals there is high competition from other authors and research groups. It can be a challenge to get your work published, especially in your early career. It is important that you can create interest of your research results by capturing editors and reviewer's interest. It can be stressful getting a paper published in a scientific journal.

>> Here are some tips so you hopefully don't get stressed during the preparation of your manuscript, submission and reviewers' comments!
 
 

 


More information on all EUROSON Schools can be found on www.efsumb.org >>

 

European Journal of Ultrasound 04-2024

Metzler JM, Finger L, Burckhardt T et al.

We present a new systematic, comprehensive, checklist-based sonographic assessment of endometriosis in the female true pelvis. Emphasis is placed on practical skills teaching. The newly introduced White Sliding Line (WSL) is the core structure. The WSL separates five compartments (anterior, central, posterior, and lateral right and left) containing dedicated endometriosis signs of mobility and morphology to be checked. This approach relies on the 2016 IDEA Consensus and further developments.

 

 

 

Eun NL, Lee E, Park AY et al.

The purpose is to develop and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for ultrasound (US) microflow imaging (MFI) in breast cancer diagnosis. We retrospectively collected a dataset consisting of 516 breast lesions (364 benign and 152 malignant) in 471 women who underwent B-mode US and MFI. The internal dataset was split into training (n = 410) and test datasets (n = 106) for developing AI algorithms from deep convolutional neural networks from MFI.

 

Herzog M, Arsova M, Matthes K et al.

Since handheld ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, objective criteria to determine image quality are needed. We therefore conducted a comparison of objective quality measures and clinical performance. A comparison of handheld devices (Butterfly IQ+, Clarius HD, Clarius HD3, Philips Lumify, GE VScan Air) and workstations (GE Logiq E10, Toshiba Aplio 500) was performed using a phantom. As a comparison, clinical investigations were performed by two experienced ultrasonographers by measuring the resolution of anatomical structures in the liver, pancreas, and intestine in ten subjects.